Archive for January, 2010

CIO Bill Smead quoted by Bloomberg (1/29/2010)

Friday, January 29th, 2010

Bill Smead quoted by Bloomberg News

U.S. Stocks Fall as Technology Concern Overshadows GDP Growth

by Nikolaj Gammeltoft and Elizabeth Stanton

For more information go to www.bloomberg.com.

The information contained in this article represents SCM’s opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The securities identified and described in this article do not represent all of the securities purchased or recommended for our clients. It should not be assumed that investing in these securities was or will be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management with in the past twelve month period is available upon request.
Share This Post

CIO Bill Smead on CNBC’s Squawk on the Street (1/28/2009)

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

The information contained in this tv appearance represents SCM’s opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The securities identified and described in this tv appearance do not represent all of the securities purchased or recommended for our clients. It should not be assumed that investing in these securities was or will be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management with in the past twelve month period is available upon request.

Share This Post

Hall of Fame Companies: Making the Liquid Illiquid

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

William Smead
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Investment Officer

Printable Version Printable Version
Subscribe to the Missives Podcast
Click here to listen to this Missive

Dear Fellow Investors:

Why do most people make money owning their home? Why do folks make money on company stock and ten-year options? The answer is they hold these investments for a long time. If you hold a sound investment for ten to twenty years you typically get rewarded quite well. However, most human beings never participate in an investment for twenty years in anything other than their home or a piece of investment property. Why do investors hold most investments for short time periods when all the evidence is that you get the greatest rewards for long holding periods?

Historically, homes have appreciated at around 5% in the U.S. and common stocks have gained around 10% from a combination of appreciation and dividends. Why do US households have most of their capital tied up in real estate? We believe the biggest factor is liquidity. The only investments folks hold for twenty years are relatively illiquid. The cost and hassle of buying and selling property causes people to hang on. The hassle of moving your residence and the added monthly payments of buying a new one preclude activity. The fact that the price is not printed in the newspaper every day and there isn’t a willing buyer every day causes longer holding periods. We at Smead Capital Management think people are better off for having invested in real estate for long holding periods.

This brings us to our theme for this year-Hall of Fame Companies. Hall of Fame Companies have unusual success, great consistency and long duration. Why haven’t more investors participated on an uninterrupted basis in the common stock of McDonald’s (MCD) or Disney (DIS) or Merck (MRK) the last twenty years? Why do investors put their investable assets with money managers, financial advisors or financial institutions which make no attempt to own the same good quality common stocks for a long time? We believe one of the main reasons is that these terrific companies and their common shares are liquid every business day of the year. Someone offers to buy your shares every day. The temptation to time the cycles or shorten the reward period is overwhelming.

The New York Stock Exchange reported in 2009 that the average holding period for common stocks dropped below a year for the first time since the late 1920’s. Since investors invest in their rear-view mirror and good quality common stocks have had one of their worst ten-year stretches in history, investors don’t believe that they can get a long-term reward from the very thing that they are the most likely to get it from. One of our main jobs as portfolio managers is to help these very liquid investments become illiquid. Most investors and money managers take their cue from stock market trends, economic growth expectations or views of the current political leadership. We want to shepherd folks through long holding periods with companies that fit our Eight Criteria. In the process, we believe we will be able to look back in twenty years and realize that our client’s wealth has been determined by the companies we own which end up making the Hall of Fame.

Best Wishes,

William Smead

The information contained in this missive represents SCM’s opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Some of the securities identified and described in this missive are a sample of issuers being currently recommended for suitable clients as of the date of this missive and do not represent all of the securities purchased or recommended for our clients. It should not be assumed that investing in these securities was or will be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management with in the past twelve month period is available upon request.

Share This Post

CIO Bill Smead quoted by Bloomberg (1/21/2010)

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

Bill Smead quoted by Bloomberg News

Starbucks Sees Growth in Packaged Coffees, Drinks

by Courtney Dentch and Betty Liu

For more information go to www.bloomberg.com.

The information contained in this article represents SCM’s opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The securities identified and described in this article do not represent all of the securities purchased or recommended for our clients. It should not be assumed that investing in these securities was or will be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management with in the past twelve month period is available upon request.
Share This Post

Making Great Business Music

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

William Smead
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Investment Officer

Printable Version Printable Version
Subscribe to the Missives Podcast
Click here to listen to this Missive

Dear Fellow Investors:

Music played on gigantic church organs has structural and variable components. The church the organ is housed in, the organ, the pipes and the bench you sit on to play the organ are all critical fixed components. The organist and the sheet music are variable. Each church has multiple organists, but some songs are written and used by almost every church which has an organ. Think of “How Great Thou Art” or “Amazing Grace” and imagine how many copies of the sheet music to these old hymns are sold. The fixed or structural components are critical, but not a great business, because once you have an organ, pipes and a bench you won’t need a new one for a long time. This is what some people call infrastructure. The organ and organ pipe business is only as good as large church growth. Every church needs sheet music even if it only has a keyboard. The writer of songs and their sheet music publishing house don’t have to invest in churches, organs, pipes, benches or pianists to sell their product. Someone else is bearing most of the cost associated with creating the need for your product. And your product wears out faster than the other components of great music.

I’ll give you a few historical examples. SLM Holdings (SLM) or Sallie Mae facilitates the student lending process. They don’t have to create colleges or students or the favorable economics that a college education provides. Coca Cola (KO) sells syrup for soda drinks. They don’t have to create McDonald’s (MCD) restaurants or movie theaters or sporting events or homes. Microsoft (MSFT) didn’t make computers or semiconductors. They only made the operating systems and the software for utilizing the computer. Computer and semiconductor manufacturers bore a large part of the cost of the industry. Not only did these companies (SLM, KO, MFST) have repeat business, but someone else covered a large part of the expense associated with the impressive profitability, high returns on equity and long duration of the business. If you are wondering, this is exactly why we don’t like Microsoft trying to invent new product lines by bearing the brunt of the structural expenses.

Which brings us to an announcement made by Proctor and Gamble (PG) recently. They are going to begin selling their top brands directly through the Internet. They say it is because they can learn large amounts of information about their customers. We know that WalMart (WMT) has every intention of being the dominant online merchandising company in the world and Amazon has the lead at the moment. Nordstrom (JWN) is growing faster in their online division than in any other aspect of their business. What does this tell us? It tells us that these great companies are going to bear a large part of the structural costs of a company called PayPal, the largest online payment system and a wholly-owned subsidiary of eBay (EBAY). The next time you look at a company to invest, consider how much of the structural costs of the industry they bear and it might help you figure out if they can make terrific money from making great music.

Best Wishes,

William Smead

The information contained in this missive represents SCM’s opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Some of the securities identified and described in this missive are a sample of issuers being currently recommended for suitable clients as of the date of this missive and do not represent all of the securities purchased or recommended for our clients. It should not be assumed that investing in these securities was or will be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management with in the past twelve month period is available upon request.

Share This Post