Posts Tagged ‘Bill Gross’

SCM 3rd Quarter 2009 Newsletter

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

Gentlemen Prefer Bonds

» Sign up for Smead Capital Management’s Quarterly Newsletters

Marilyn Monroe was a physically beautiful woman who figured out early in her career that coloring her hair blonde would draw attention. Not only did it further her career, but it led her to make a movie called “Gentlemen Prefer Blondes”. We at Smead Capital Management are sure that women, who are intelligent and beautiful without being blonde, are dumbfounded by the attraction men have to platinum hair. It doesn’t surprise us, however, because we have been seeing the same kind of visual and emotional attraction work in the investment markets over the last 29 years. As we look out into the fourth quarter of 2009, we will look at one of those eye-catchers today because “Gentlemen Prefer Bonds”.

 

Click Here to Read On

Share This Post

Battle of the Heavyweights

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

William Smead
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Investment Officer

Printable Version Printable Version
Subscribe to the Missives Podcast

 

Dear Fellow Investors:

We are witnessing one of the greatest battles to control the hearts and minds of investors that we at Smead Capital Management have just about ever seen. In one corner you have PIMCO and their fearless leader Bill Gross, buying longer-term Treasury bonds. They see the world as a giant game of deleveraging as the large U.S. government and household debt is worked off in a muted economic recovery. They see a “new normal” set of spending patterns and higher savings rates leading to slow growth rates and low levels of inflation or possibly deflation. It is our opinion that PIMCO and Gross have been super successful, outperforming other bond market participants for years in one of the best bond investing eras in U.S. history. The amount of money they manage has reached legendary proportions and they have huge influence in the debt markets in which they maneuver.

In the other corner are such heavyweights as Warren Buffett, James Grant and Julian Robertson. Buffett is actively buying stocks in the U.S. He fears that inflation is a natural by-product of all the efforts of the Federal Reserve Board and U.S. Government to stimulate the economy. James Grant, one of the best writers and contrary thinkers in the money world, recently shared his opinions in an op-ed piece in the New York Times. Looking back at history, Grant surmises that the deeper the recession the more explosive and powerful the two to three-year economic rebound has been. He sees the large camp of economists assuming a poor/jobless recovery as a good psychological signal. Julian Robertson, one of the deans of Hedge Fund investing, is short U.S. Treasuries across the board and sees very high interest and inflation rates coming as a consequence of quantitative easing and Federal stimulus efforts. Who should you/we believe?

First, I’d like to give you our SCM caveats. We believe that the merits of the companies we invest in based on our Eight Criteria are the most important factor in how we will do over the next ten years. Second, we don’t believe we can predict the stock market or the economy. We like the fact that our criteria has the tendency to find strong balance sheets, powerful brands, high free cash flow generators and wide moats, because they are more likely to withstand whatever environment plays out.

With caveats in hand, here is SCM’s feeling about the arguments from these titans. Bond mutual funds have been receiving $20 of inflows for every $1 received by equity funds since the beginning of March. In our 29 years, we have virtually never seen that kind of overwhelming popularity get rewarded over the next three years. Therefore, Bill Gross and PIMCO look due to have the markets they dominate become more difficult. Since 1984 we have had a huge bull market in Treasury bonds as they peaked at 14% interest rate. At 3.4% today, PIMCO has mathematics working against them. Near the end of the 1982 to 1999 era, Warren Buffett and common stocks were enormously popular. Buffett spoke in Sun Valley to a group of business owners and executives who had been made mega-wealthy by the bull market in stocks. He told them that stocks would do poorly from then to 2016, if history was any guide. He was spot on, as the next ten years proved to be one of the worst decades in U.S. history for stocks. I don’t hear PIMCO saying anything vaguely similar about bonds today.

We don’t agree with Julian Robertson, primarily because of the speed and magnitude of interest rate increases he is advertising. He looked on T.V. the other day like someone who had a big position going and wants to by-pass the normal holding period to see it succeed. There is little evidence that the over-capitalization of the banks in the U.S. is resulting in any meaningful lending and debt monetization (read “Monopoly Money”). We believe the inflation he fears appears to be years away, not months.

Last, but not least, is James Grant. We believe that he has a few powerful forces working in his favor. The economic coma we entered last year in September lasted until the end of March of 2009. Any discretionary economic activity which occurs in the next six months could cause fairly sizable economic growth numbers and possibly boost consumer confidence and hiring. Maybe as important is how unequivocally negative most market participants are about the long-term future of the U.S. economy. I was around in 1982. There was as much disbelief in the possibility of a rousing long-term comeback in the U.S. economy then as there is now. As fellow contrarians, we believe he must be taken seriously. We should harken our thoughts to some of the widespread belief on the part of investors who may be adding more smoke to the “Mythical Argument.”

Best Wishes,

William Smead

The information contained in this missive represents SCM’s opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The securities identified and described in this missive do not represent all of the securities purchased or recommended for our clients. It should not be assumed that investing in these securities was or will be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management with in the past twelve month period is available upon request.

Share This Post

Mythical Argument

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

William Smead
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Investment Officer

Printable Version Printable Version
Subscribe to the Missives Podcast
Click here to listen to this Missive

Dear Clients and Prospective Clients:

In a recent interview on CNBC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Chief Market Strategist Tobias Levkovich talked about the “Mythical Argument” that consumers are never going to spend again. The thesis is that the behavior of consumers will be permanently changed as a result of the depth and length of this recession. In turn, high levels of unemployment could decline doggedly. High sustained levels of unemployment and large over-hanging consumer and government debt could serve as a force field, preventing meaningful real economic growth for years. Leading proponents of this argument are Bill Gross (PIMCO) and Jeremy Grantham (GMO). Tobias argued that their argument is so ingrained in existing portfolio management actions that it just might be a myth. At Smead Capital Management, we believe we are positioned to do well in that environment. We believe our large-cap recession-resistant brand name companies could thrive if that argument holds water.

However, we must constantly harken back to the idea that “When everyone knows’ something to be true, nobody knows nothin’”. Belief in the “weak economy for years” argument has caused a huge amount of U.S. investor capital to chase commodities and worldwide infrastructure investments. These investors are going where they think the economic growth is going to be and want to protect themselves from whatever inflation comes from the policy decisions made to avert an economic depression and come out of this recession. There are some big problems with their approach. First, the BRIC trade or idea that the economic world will be led by the emerging markets of the world peaked last year (2008) in a bubble. Bubbles take a minimum of 5 to 7 years to correct and many times take as long as 10 years or more to return as a profitable concept. Therefore, if history is any guide, Oil, commodities and emerging markets could be dead money for a number of years.

Second, even if emerging market economies do lead us out of this recession and into a period of prosperity, they may not be a good place to invest. Franklin-Templeton’s emerging market strategist Mark Mobius said on Bloomberg recently that an enormous amount of new shares of common stock will be issued as Chinese companies go public in the next five years. Fast growing nations and their economies can be capital absorbers, rather than capital multipliers. How can this be so? When our nation’s residential real estate markets and economy boomed between 2002 and 2006, capital was drawn away from most stock market sectors. Basic materials, commodities and heavy industrial stocks gained capital and affection, while most other sectors suffered capital withdrawals. Individuals have been massive net sellers of U.S. equities since the peak of the market in early 2000 when they held $10 trillion of individually owned shares. At the recent March of 2009 lows, that figure was close to $5 trillion. The economic growth absorbed the capital and the same thing could happen in China. It happened in the U.S. as we built the railroad system in the second half of the 1800’s. Our nation grew immensely and spread westward, but we absorbed massive capital and much of it never got paid back to the countries like Britain and France which loaned it to us.

I will say the unspeakable. From the “reset” levels of the 2008-09 contraction, consumers could make a consistent comeback as they become convinced that our system will continue to succeed and gasoline isn’t going to cost $4 per gallon or higher. If the idea that American consumers won’t make a comeback is a “Mythical Argument”, what could happen the next few years? Unbelievable profits could come out of the income statements of lean and mean corporations. What would a year-to-year sales gain of 5% do for the profits of Nordstrom, Starbucks or WalMart? How much money could Home Depot make if people quit worrying about their job and the price of gas and started fixing everything that is wrong with the home they want to live their life in? What if all the kids who want to go to Disneyland and DisneyWorld get to go next year? What if you could have a good economy for years without building up debts in the process? What if this cleansing of the last two years really worked and we ended up with one of the best long-term economies we’ve ever had?

Best Wishes,

William Smead

The information contained in this missive represents SCM’s opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The securities identified and described in this missive do not represent all of the securities purchased or recommended for our clients. It should not be assumed that investing in these securities was or will be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management with in the past twelve month period is available upon request.

Share This Post