Posts Tagged ‘Shareholder Friendlines’

Wonderful Companies

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

William Smead
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Investment Officer

Printable Version Printable Version
Subscribe to the Missives Podcast
Click here to listen to this Missive

Dear Clients and Prospective Clients:

We are all being drowned in information each day. Most of this information has to do with the effect of the current economic contraction and the policies being used to turn things around. Since it seems that nobody wants to talk about wonderful companies, I’d thought we’d share some of Smead Capital Management’s opinions on the subject.

Here’s a list of some of the attributes of a wonderful company in our eyes:
1) High levels of profitability on invested capital with little or no leverage
2) Number one or two in the industry
3) Brand synonymous with product or industry
4) Transparency of management
5) Non-cyclical core business
6) High Barriers to entry (Strong Moat)

We could go on, but let me get to the point. In 29 years in the investment business we’ve learned that wealth is created by owning wonderful businesses for a long time and that your returns are enhanced if you get to buy them when their price is depressed. Usually the only time wonderful businesses get depressed in price is when the whole stock market goes way down and/or the economy contracts and provides short-term difficulty to even the strongest businesses.

We believe that three to five years from now people will look back and say, “What was I thinking about in late 2008 and early 2009 as I sat on low interest paying vehicles and didn’t add to existing holdings or use these bargains to get in somewhere around the ground floor?” Help us to help you!

Best Wishes,

William Smead

The information contained in this missive represents SCM’s opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The securities identified and described in this missive do not represent all of the securities purchased or recommended for our clients. It should not be assumed that investing in these securities was or will be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management with in the past twelve month period is available upon request.

Share This Post

For-Profit or Non-Profit

Friday, January 16th, 2009

William Smead
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Investment Officer


 

 

 

Dear Clients and Prospective Clients:

At Smead Capital Management we are strong believers in owning high-quality recession-resistant common stocks and holding them for many years to create wealth and meet economic needs. Normally, the finest of the U.S. banks are a great way to make dividends and ultimately see capital appreciation. However, the current efforts on the part of the U.S. Treasury to stabilize our financial system seem to be having a detrimental affect on the common stocks of exactly those banks which the Treasury wants to build our financial system around. We are adjusting to this new reality and let me explain.

One of our eight criteria for selecting companies is shareholder friendliness. Is the company allocating capital, paying and/or raising dividends, buying back stock and making effective acquisitions in a way that is friendly to shareholders? In the case of a JP Morgan or a Wells Fargo, the answer to that question in the past has been absolutely. But in the new environment of Treasury intervention their past record appears to be breaking down. When the Treasury is giving you money to invest and wants you to loan it out, can you buy back stock when a lousy market environment drives your stock price lower? When a current negative feedback loop exists in the economy where one company’s layoffs lead to layoffs of others companies, doesn’t that put further loan write downs at the bank in position to make it hard to pay the dividends? When this all played out at Washington Federal Savings and Loan here in Seattle recently, it was a warning shot across the bow. Nobody has been more conservative about lending, credit quality and expense control than Washington Fed, but they were asked to take TARP money and cut their dividend soon after by 76%.

The problem is we are using for-profit institutions to produce goals for a non-profit institution and the companies are being run for the social good rather than for the shareholders. Investments in these great companies are being diluted and the rewards for their survival and future prosperity are being pushed out further into the future. This is because they aren’t being controlled by outstanding management people like CEO Jamie Dimon or John Stumpf, but rather have had control put in the hands of the U.S. Government. We are re-researching all of our financial companies to see if these dynamics are in force and could be detrimental to our capital over the next 12 months. With a plethora of great companies which meet our eight criteria available out there and unaffected by Treasury intervention, we think the opportunities could work in our favor until the time comes when we can understand the affect on shareholders and management friendliness of this new business model.

Best Wishes,

William Smead

Share This Post