William Smead
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Investment Officer

Printable Version
Subscribe to the Missives Podcast
Click here to listen to this Missive

Dear Clients and Prospective Clients:

There are very good reasons to avoid investing in emerging markets. Below is a list of some of those reasons:

1. Political Instability (Russia, Honduras, Venezuela, etc.)
2. Small Markets (less liquid)
3. Poorly Regulated
4. Unusual Accounting
5. Currency Risk

However, I’d like to make the case for investing to make money from emerging markets. Five years ago my family and I took a trip to the Bay Islands of Honduras. While there I noticed that one of the only companies selling products to these Honduran Islanders was the Coca-Cola Company by way of the Fanta soda line. It reminded me of 1988 and Warren Buffett stepping outside of his usual proclivity to buy into the stock of a great company when the share price falls into some significant distress. Coke had gone up about five-fold since the bottom in 1982 and sported a trailing 12-month P/E ratio of 18. Buffett bought a major stake in the company and dumbfounded his fondest admirers in the process. Buffett said at that time that he “could go away for ten years” and he’d know that Coke would be doing well.

One of the main reasons that Buffett could have that kind of confidence was that the Berlin Wall was preparing to fall. Countries in Eastern Europe and Latin America were getting political freedom and adopting free-market capitalism. Any improvement in a third-world country’s circumstances was going to create a chance to sell something clean to drink. Nobody does that better than Coca Cola. With Coke he never had to take the risks listed above to make money from emerging markets. He only had to trust the brand, the balance sheet, the distribution system, the economies of scale and the management of the company.

A front page article in last week’s Wall Street Journal that discusses the distribution of drugs in emerging market countries tells you everything you need to know to make money investing in emerging markets in the next ten years. IMS Health reports that in 2003 there was $67.2 billion of prescription pharmaceuticals purchased in emerging market nations. In 2008 it had grown to $152 billion and IMS predicts it will hit $265 billion in 2013. How many companies in the world have the brands, balance sheets, patents, distribution, economies of scale and management to do this? Exporting health to the world will be an incredibly rewarding business both financially and ethically. It will help other businesses succeed by improving the quality and length of life for people in countries ranging from China and India to the smallest countries in Latin America and Africa. The difference this time is the companies that we are interested in like Merck and Pfizer are trading at distressed P/E levels as compared to the last twenty five years. Buffett did well on his investment in Coke, but the drug stocks start this cycle trading at distressed prices the way Buffett usually likes to buy shares.

Best Wishes,

William Smead

The information contained in this missive represents SCM’s opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The securities identified and described in this missive do not represent all of the securities purchased or recommended for our clients. It should not be assumed that investing in these securities was or will be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management with in the past twelve month period is available upon request.

William Smead
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Investment Officer

Printable Version
Subscribe to the Missives Podcast
Click here to listen to this Missive

Dear Clients and Prospective Clients:

One of the most famous parables in the Bible can be found in the book of Luke, the Seventh Chapter. Jesus compares the Kingdom of God to farming. The farmer spreads seed around the land. Some falls on the path, gets trampled and eaten by birds. Some lands on the rocks and does not grow due to a lack of moisture. Some grows up among the thorns and gets choked in the process. Some falls on good soil and yields 100 times itself.

In the long run, the stock market is the same as farming. Most investors use an approach designed to produce short-run success. Some use momentum models designed to get on the hot path, only to get eaten up by paying too much for future success. Some invest in concept stocks and buck such low probabilities that their losers rob all the moisture from their winners. Some seek to predict the economy or use wide asset allocation and choke on errant macro-economic predictions or faith in obscure or illiquid asset classes. Some rely on wide moats and the generation of ample and long lasting free cash flow that can make many times their original investment over many decades.

At Smead Capital Management, we’d like to focus on the successful part of the farming analogy. It refers to “good soil”. What is good soil for an investor? We believe it is buying shares of an outstanding business for less than its intrinsic value and holding it for years as the company continues to succeed. We believe we are more likely to do that in companies which will survive and prosper much longer than other companies. The most important factors in longevity for a public company are balance sheet, product necessity and strength of moat.

To understand why we think this way we would like to refer you to the writing of Brett Arends of the “Wall Street Journal” in a May 11th article called, “How to Value Stocks? Ignore Economic News”. In it he chronicles the work of Ben Inker, Director of Asset Allocation at contrarian fund company Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo & Company (GMO). Inker points out that the present value or intrinsic value of a company is the discounted value of all future cash flows and dividends. And Inker can’t understand why people put so much emphasis on what is going on in the stock market right now or in the economy next year when they seek to analyze common stocks. He thinks they are mistaken for two reasons.

First, because most of the value of shares really depends on the cash they will generate many years, even decades, ahead. The next few years are only a minuscule part of the equation. “Since stocks do not have an expiration date and dividends grow over time,” Mr. Inker argues, “the duration of stocks is extremely long. If we assume that half of the return from stocks in a given year comes from the dividends and half from the growth in dividends, most of the value of stocks comes from cash flows in the distant future.”

How distant? Using Mr. Inker’s hypothesis, it turns out that about 75% of the value of shares is actually based on dividends that will be paid more than eleven years from now. Half the value is based on dividends to be paid after 25 years, and a quarter on those to be paid after about 50 years.

In other words, when you look at the market today, three quarters of its true value is based on what companies will earn and pay out after 2020 and half is based on what they will do after 2034. So really, how much attention should you pay to next quarter’s earnings?

We at SCM love his logical and mathematical conclusion. Since most of the current value of a company comes from discounting cash flows and dividends coming years and decades from now, our analysis should be spent trying to ferret out the companies which can survive at high levels of profitability the longest. It reminds us of why Warren Buffett paid an astounding 18 times trailing earnings to buy a large stake in Coca Cola back in 1988. When asked why Buffett answered, “‘Let’s say you were going away for ten years,’ he explained. and you wanted to make one investment and you know everything that you know now, and you couldn’t change it while you’re gone. What would you think about?’” He knew that he could discount cash flows and dividends thirty, forty and even fifty years out and Inker proves that those future flows make up most of the current or intrinsic value of a stock.

His second reason is that economic performance follows a fairly consistent long-term path and gravitates towards the mean. If the economy has been terrible, it is likely to revert back to acting better. If it has been terrific for quite awhile, it is headed for difficulty. At SCM we are asking whether the current economic trouble is making our companies more or less likely to survive and prosper for many decades? We think the overwhelming answer is that the current circumstances are making the kinds of companies we like to own more likely to survive! Six Flags declares bankruptcy and Disney gets stronger. Washington Mutual disappears and Wells Fargo gets stronger. Nobody wants to finance young biotechs, so Merck and Pfizer will buy most of the great future science. The list goes on and on. The economic cleansing of the last two years has done more to strengthen and widen the moats of strong balance sheet companies with powerful brands and distribution chains than any phase in history in our opinion. However, since these facts are long term in nature, the marketplace actually discounts these virtues rather than giving them their usual premium. We believe that the next few years could very well rectify the under valuation of the most valuable franchises in business and our companies could turn out to be “good soil”. We will leave investments on the path, on a rock or in the thorns to someone else.

Best Wishes,

William Smead

The information contained in this missive represents SCM’s opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The securities identified and described in this missive do not represent all of the securities purchased or recommended for our clients. It should not be assumed that investing in these securities was or will be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management with in the past twelve month period is available upon request.

William Smead
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Investment Officer

Printable Version
Subscribe to the Missives Podcast
Click here to listen to this Missive

Dear Clients and Prospective Clients:

I believe that an individual’s income is close to the average of their ten best friends. This could be why an estimated 35,000 people sought to make friends with Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger in Omaha on Saturday at the Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting. Buffett is the Chairman and Chief Investment Officer of Berkshire and is the world’s third wealthiest man, while Charlie is Vice-Chairman and has a $1.5 Billion net worth (which is not chump change). Even at the ages of 78 and 85, respectively, these two billionaire investors can hand out the wisdom.

What I find the most interesting about what these men say about investing is the clarity and simplicity of their investment decisions. Unfortunately for most investors, the part that holds most people back from imitating these great investors is the patience, contrarianism and humility associated with executing a non-widely diversified buy and hold common stock investing style. At Smead Capital Management we seek to practice these virtues.

Here are examples from last weekend of these separating virtues:

On the subject of patience, Charlie Munger said Friday, “I think the reality is that if you hold a stock for a long long term even though it’s screamingly successful as an investment, you will have huge declines in the value of that stock two or three times in half a century. And I don’t think that should bother long term holders all that much.”

While everyone is scared to death of banks, the ultra contrary Buffett said, “I would love to buy all of US Bancorp or I would love to buy all of Wells Fargo, if we were allowed to do it.” Buffett spoke again about Wells Fargo and the $9 price it had earlier this year. “If I had put all my net worth in one stock, that would be the stock.” This is a stock he started buying in the last major financial crisis in 1991.

On the search for a Chief Investment Officer to replace him in the future, Buffett shared that he has found four good potential replacements. Instead of chasing recent out-performance (like most investors do), he shared that none of them had beaten the S&P 500 Index last year (which means they lost more than 37% of their beginning year value). He and Munger also added that sitting on large amounts of cash to avoid last year’s decline did not impress them or influence their decision.

On another note of humility, Warren had to eat some humble pie. “Buffett said Saturday that he was ‘disappointed’ when Moody’s cut its Berkshire ratings, though he said the decision was lamentable mostly because it led to a 1oss of ‘bragging rights’ – not because it will materially raise Berkshire’s borrowing costs.” Maybe it is God’s way of getting him back for undercutting the municipal bond insurance companies and then using information they had shared with him to compete in the bond insurance business in the middle of the panic and the credit crisis last year. Warren needs to relearn the Mike Milken lesson of the junk bond era of the 1980’s. Leave some business for everyone else and not just crumbs.

On simplicity, both men reiterated that if you need a calculator for making an investment decision or if your investment relies on computing some sophisticated mathematical formula, in their minds it is a bad idea. I always told my kids that all the math you need to learn to make a great deal of money in investing or in business is learned by the end of 7th grade.

Reading and listening to these two great investors over the weekend makes those of us at SCM that much more excited about the great companies we own, the investors who are along with us for the ride and how much money we could make in the aftermath of the recent fire sale in the stock market. You supply the patience and we’ll supply what we think are the great companies because the stock market has already handed out the humility!

Best Wishes,

William Smead

The information contained in this missive represents SCM’s opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The securities identified and described in this missive do not represent all of the securities purchased or recommended for our clients. It should not be assumed that investing in these securities was or will be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management with in the past twelve month period is available upon request.

William Smead
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Investment Officer

Printable Version
Subscribe to the Missives Podcast
Click here to listen to this Missive

Dear Clients and Prospective Clients:

As the first four weeks of a powerful upswing in the stock market unfolds, we thought we would use a few moments of your time to ask a few questions.

1) What if the crowds of professional and individual investors are as wrong at extremes this time as they have been in the past?

2) What if the money in money market funds, CDs, savings accounts and T-bills all tries to come back into stocks at the same time?

3) What if Warren Buffett’s Oct 18, 2008 editorial about “Buy American, I Am” proves to be excellent advice?

4) What if the people who were smart enough to avoid some of the bear market on the way down never get back in on the way back up?

5) What if the fact that stocks dramatically outperform Treasury Bonds over long periods of time reasserts itself quickly?

6) What if buying and holding blue chips stocks works significantly better than trading in and out?

7) What if President Obama is the lucky man who leads our country as it successfully comes back from the worst economic contraction since the 1930’s?

8 ) What if gold, which has been trading exclusively on fear, goes down or nowhere for years?

9) What if everybody stops postponing the work they need to do on their home?

10) What if everyone who needs a new car buys one?

11) What if Starbuck’s coffee continues to be legal, addictive and tastes great?

12) What if the major Pharmaceutical companies sell more drugs in the future in China and India than they sell in the U.S.?

13) What if the people who sat through the worst stock market decline in 70 years are fully invested at the bottom and enjoy years of success because of it?

If you are underinvested in common stocks and/or are not investing with us, it is not too late to buy by any means!

Warm Regards,

William Smead

The information contained in this missive represents SCM’s opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The securities identified and described in this missive do not represent all of the securities purchased or recommended for our clients. It should not be assumed that investing in these securities was or will be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management with in the past twelve month period is available upon request.

William Smead
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Investment Officer

Dear Clients and Prospective Clients:

In the midst of this historically poor start to the year 2009 in the stock market (S&P 500 year-to-date return), we thought it would be helpful to give you some reading in between the lines of the Berkshire Hathaway Annual Letter.

1) “Book Value fell 9.6% and the stock price fell 32%”

Translation: This was the worst year out of 44 on an absolute basis for Berkshire Hathaway. Book value has grown at 20.3% on average over 44 years!

2) “By the fourth quarter, the credit crisis, coupled with tumbling home and stock prices, had produced a paralyzing fear that engulfed the country. A freefall in business activity ensued, accelerating at a pace that I have never before witnessed. The U.S. – and much of the world – became trapped in a vicious negative-feedback cycle. Fear led to business contraction, and that in turn led to even greater fear.”

Translation: What we at SCM describe as an “economic coma” has been as swift and violent as any Warren Buffett has seen in his adult business life.

3) “Amid this bad news, however, never forget that our country has faced far worse travails in the past. In the 20th Century alone, we dealt with two great wars (one of which we initially appeared to be losing); a dozen or so panics and recessions; virulent inflation that led to a 21.5% prime rate in 1980; and the Great Depression of the 1930s, when unemployment ranged between 15% and 25% for many years. America has had no shortage of challenges. Without fail, however, we’ve overcome them. In the face of those obstacles – and many others – the real standard of living for Americans improved nearly seven-fold during the 1900s, while the Dow Jones Industrials rose from 66 to 11,497. Compare the record of this period with the dozens of centuries during which humans secured only tiny gains, if any, in how they lived. Though the path has not been smooth, our economic system has worked extraordinarily well over time. It has unleashed human potential as no other system has, and it will continue to do so. America’s best days lie ahead.”

Translation: It has been a long time since we had a major and painful economic contraction. We have grown soft because of it and the steep decline in stocks has every intention of robbing all of us of our optimism. It won’t rob Warren’s and it won’t rob ours at SCM.

4) “Take a look again at the 44-year table on page 2. In 75% of those years, the S&P stocks recorded again. I would guess that a roughly similar percentage of years will be positive in the next 44. But neither Charlie Munger, my partner in running Berkshire, nor I can predict the winning and losing years in advance. (In our usual opinionated view, we don’ t think anyone else can either.) We’re certain, for example, that the economy will be in shambles throughout 2009 – and, for that matter, probably well beyond – but that conclusion does not tell us whether the stock market will rise or fall.”

Translation: Don’t extrapolate forward the recent down trend. Picture where you are as an owner of common stocks and where you want to be in five years and stick with your discipline.

5) “I told you in an earlier part of this report that last year I made a major mistake of commission (and maybe more; this one sticks out). Without urging from Charlie or anyone else, I bought a large amount of ConocoPhillips stock when oil and gas prices were near their peak. I in no way anticipated the dramatic fall in energy prices that occurred in the last half of the year. I still believe the odds are good that oil sells far higher in the future than the current $40-$50 price. But so far I have been dead wrong. Even if prices should rise, moreover, the terrible timing of my purchase has cost Berkshire several billion dollars.”

Translation: Warren got caught in the “Peak Oil” Bubble last year and believes that oil will rise in price in the future. Too many investment people agree with Warren and we believe that he will need a great deal of time to get even on Conoco.

6) “I made some other already-recognizable errors as well. They were smaller, but unfortunately not that small. During 2008, I spent $244 m illion for shares of two Irish banks that appeared cheap to me. At yearend we wrote these holdings down to market: $27 million, for an 89% loss. Since then, the two stocks have declined even further. The tennis crowd would call my mistakes “unforced errors.”

Translation: Warren’s existing holdings in Wells Fargo, American Express axp and US Bank usb punished him in the last year and he got burned badly by dabbling in a few new financial institutions. There is grace for us at SCM in his difficulties!

7) “The investment world has gone from underpricing risk to overpricing it. This change has not been minor; the pendulum has covered an extraordinary arc. A few years ago, it would have seemed unthinkable that yields like today’s could have been obtained on good-grade municipal or corporate bonds even while risk-free governments offered near-zero returns on short-term bonds and no better than a pittance on long-terms. When the financial history of this decade is written, it will surely speak of the Internet bubble of the late 1990s and the housing bubble of the early 2000s. But the U.S. Treasury bond bubble of late 2008 may be regarded as almost equally extraordinary.

Clinging to cash equivalents or long-term government bonds at present yields is almost certainly a terrible policy if continued for long. Holders of these instruments, of course, have felt increasingly comfortable – in fact, almost smug – in following this policy as financial turmoil has mounted. They regard their judgment confirmed when they hear commentators proclaim “cash is king,” even though that wonderful cash is earning close to nothing and will surely find its purchasing power eroded over time.

Approval, though, is not the goal of investing. In fact, approval is often counter-productive because it sedates the brain and makes it less receptive to new facts or a re-examination of conclusions formed earlier. Beware the investment activity that produces applause; the great moves are usually greeted by yawns.”

Translation: Good quality stocks and bonds are underpriced and U.S. Treasuries, money market funds, CD’s and savings accounts are overpriced! However, to gain the benefit from this investment discrepancy you must deal with the possibility that the markets continue to deepen the underpricing and raise the overpricing!

We know we have given you a great deal to consider, but in these trying times in investing we hope we are serving you well by modeling the behavior of the greatest investor of all time.

Warm Regards,

William Smead

The securities identified and described in this missive do not represent all of the securities purchased or recommended for our clients. It should not be assumed that investing in these securities was or will be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management with in the past twelve month period is available upon request.